Sunday, January 02, 2005
« Passive Data vs “Active” Data | Main | Microsoft has a marketing machine? »

Don Box put out his predictions for 2005, including #3 which states that the term SOA will be replaced by some new hype-word invented by the marketing wonks of various software and industry analysis companies.

As I said months ago, the S in SOA is a dollar sign. SOA is much more hype than reality, which means it is created and defined by marketing people far more than it is by actual computer scientists or engineers.

As is often the case with over-hyped concepts, the terms related to those concepts rapidly become meaningless. What is SOA? Depends on which vendor you ask. What is a service? Depends on which vendor you ask. It is all a meaningless jumble here at the start of 2005.

Of course the concept is too valuable to marketeers[1] for them to give up just because a term has been lost. So I am sure Don is right and marketing groups at Microsoft, IBM, Gartner and many other organizations are busily working to decide on the next term or terms to use for a while.

So for better or worse SOA itself isn’t dead, but I agree that the term is living on borrowed time.

 

[1] Yes, I know the term is marketers, but that extra “e” in there makes it sound so much more, well, Disney somehow :-)


Sunday, January 02, 2005 7:16:12 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I agree completely about hype of SOA. I can't wait to see what the next big Marketing this is to come. Back in 1999 when Bill Gates announced BizTalk, there was so much hype for the b2b technology which ended up being webservices and then SOA.

At the end of the day: "There is nothing new Under the sun!"

Maxim
[www.ipattern.com do you]
Sunday, January 02, 2005 8:47:34 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
MS has some incredibly talented marketers. The Technical Product Manager role is essentially a marketer that helps to determine what features go into products and how things should work. To me, that kind of marketing has a lot of value. I wouldn't dismiss the role of marketing in our greatest technology companies. Wasn't .NET a whole lot of marketing as well?
Randy H.
Sunday, January 09, 2005 8:48:37 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
[1] That's Marketroid... http://blogs.ineta.org/dtotzke/archive/2004/12/18/18020.aspx

Monday, January 10, 2005 10:03:36 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
I'm starting to get tired of the acronym dance, too. It might be ok if it were due to the evolution of technology, but you're probably right about it being driven by marketing or PR. I suppose one upside is if I can keep grokking all the new acronyms, I can ride the coattails of the techno-buzz & sound like a smart, edgy guy. ;)

Ben
www.developmentnow.com
Comments are closed.